I think there was a little more to it than one blogger getting it wrong...NZ did file something questioning something like that during the event. The baseless-ness of it would also explain why the jury responded with "even if you had filed in time, we would have ruled in Oracle's favor".
There are two issues being confused here. ETNZ wanted to know how Oracle was controlling their foils. This is why they filed a protest. Oracle's foils are controlled via push button that actuate servos that you can buy at a hobby shop that control hydraulic valves. Thats direct from the horses' mouth. THAT is what ETNZ wanted to protest - nothing having to do with any kind of stability software.
