Do you guys get the daily Scuttlebutt email/sailing news? Today's has a pretty good article about the AC and lack of commercial viability. I disagree with his view that they should go back to using mono-hulls. I can't even count how many of my non-sailing friends were (finally) watching the last cup, due in large part to the amazing speeds the flying cats were showing. If it goes back to mono-slugs, I doubt I'll even watch it.
From Scuttlebutt:
The 2007 America’s Cup in Valencia, Spain delivered the most commercially viable event in the history of the Cup:
- 60M euro profit distributed to the teams yes, a profit! - 11 Challengers - 9 Countries
This was not that long ago, and the 2007 numbers carried on from the 2000 and 2003 America’s Cup in New Zealand, which showed sponsors a positive upward trend in the ‘commercial’ development of the event.
Unfortunately, the wholesale changes that were instituted for the 2013 event have not shown a significant change to make the commercial ‘product’ better. The current model has, and will continue to, deliver less teams which equals less commerce.
The math is actually pretty simple: Less Teams = Less Countries = Less Broadcasters = Less Exposure = Less Sponsors Interest = Less Commercial Return.
So how do we get more teams to compete? - Lower the cost significantly - Use a platform type that is available and used by a wider group (owners, sailors, designers, builders, etc.)
While the technology and cool factor of the AC72 foiling cats was impressive, it didn’t deliver a significant boost in the audience numbers to justify 1/3 of the teams competing in the last event. And for this current cycle, it once again is showing less interest in teams competing in AC62′s.
If the goal is to create a commercially sustainable event, the math points to monohulls. If the America’s Cup announced that the event was to be held in TP52′s tomorrow, you’d have ten challenges in a heartbeat!
The current plan is too full of contradictory elements. The boat type is a hindrance to attracting challengers, yet its coolness has convinced organizers that it will attract viewers. And organizers only want four quality challengers to provide close competition, yet this limits the audience pool from which to attract viewers.
The sweeping changes so as to sell a ‘sexy’ event appear doomed. The market reality is that the America’s Cup is a tier 2/3 niche sport at best. Our current audience is small but highly wealthy, exclusive, passionate and global. We must speak to our core fan first (the “Flintstones”) before trying to attract new fans.
If the organizers become more humble in their approach, and build the ‘product’ reputation by delivering consistency, there is a chance of doing more good than harm. Currently, I worry that the later is being done.
